Novel harm reduction services: Compassion club membership is associated with reduced overdose

  • Home
  • Research
  • Novel harm reduction services: Compassion club membership is associated with reduced overdose

Compassion clubs are novel safer supply programs that offer members the ability to purchase drugs that have been tested for potential contamination, increasing safety. This study examined the association between enrollment in a compassion club and risk for non-fatal overdoses.

Stay on the frontiers of
recovery science
with the free, monthly
Recovery Bulletin

l

WHAT PROBLEM DOES THIS STUDY ADDRESS?

A major contributor to the ongoing drug overdose crisis in Canada, Europe, and the US is reliance on an unregulated drug supply that may be contaminated with toxic substances, such as fentanyl. This led to a recent call by British Columbia’s chief coroner to reduce people’s dependence on the unregulated drug supply by offering people who use drugs an alternative. As a result, several safer supply programs are beginning to be implemented, although they remain controversial. These programs provide substances with known doses and compositions to people who use drugs, often through prescriptions, thereby decreasing their use of drugs from an unregulated supply. The limited research that has been done to evaluate safer supply programs has shown several benefits, such as increased access to healthcare and reduced use of unregulated opioids, though not in all cases.

Only medicalized programs that provide drugs through prescriptions have been scaled-up in Canada, since non-medicalized programs are not sanctioned. Non-medicalized programs include “compassion clubs”, where substances of known compositions are distributed to its members. Although they failed to obtain a federal exemption to operate, the Drug Users Liberation Front piloted a Compassion Club for people who use cocaine, heroin, or methamphetamine in August 2022. This club serves people who live in Vancouver’s Downtown Eastside and are at high risk of overdose. Members can purchase up to 14 grams of cocaine, heroin, and methamphetamine per week at a storefront. Substances are tested to ensure they are safe and not contaminated.

Compassion clubs such as this are a very new approach to provide a safer supply of drugs and little is known about their public health impact. Researchers in this study examined the association between club membership and impact on non-fatal overdoses. Such research can shed light on the public health impact of non-medicalized safer supply programs.


HOW WAS THIS STUDY CONDUCTED?

The research team surveyed 47 compassion club members to assess whether time periods they were enrolled in the club – determined by lottery from 5 organized groups of people who use drugs in Vancouver –were associated with reduced odds of overdose relative to time periods they were not enrolled in the club over 14 months. Participants were over the age of 19, currently using drugs, and assessed as being at risk of overdose, defined as all people using drugs in the club setting, given the local drug supply’s contamination and the overall high incidence of overdose deaths.

Surveys were conducted in a private office at the compassion club that was opened by Drug Users Liberation Front in 2022. Survey data were collected by a trained research assistant every 3 months and included 3 yes or no questions assessing whether: (1) they ever had an overdose; (2) they had an overdose during the last 3 months (or since their last survey); and (3) they had an overdose where naloxone was administered during the last 3 months (or since their last survey). They were also asked if they had shared any of the drugs they obtained from the club and if so, why. Prior to enrolling in the club, participants completed 1-2 surveys. After enrolling in the club, participants completed a maximum of 5 surveys.

The primary outcomes of interest were any non-fatal overdose, which included overdose from any drug, and any non-fatal overdose where naloxone was administered, which was more specific to opioid-related overdoses (given that naloxone is used to reverse opioid-related overdoses). The primary predictor was enrollment in the Compassion Club in the last 3 months. The research team was also interested in whether the following variables could confound the possible relationship between club membership and overdoses: age at baseline, ethnicity, sex, unstable housing in the last 3 months (treated as a variable with 2 categories, one consisting of being homeless, living in a shelter or hotel, and staying with friends or family and the other defined as living in a house/apartment), and previous number of overdoses experienced throughout participants’ lives (treated as a variable with 2 categories consisting of more than 3 overdoses or less than 3).

A total of 47 people participated in the study. Initially 21 individuals were admitted to the club and then another 28 were admitted when capacity increased, but 2 of these people withdrew from the study. Of these, the median age was 47 years old and 18 identified as women. Regarding ethnicity, 29 identified as White, 23 identified as Indigenous, and 4 identified as being of other ethnicities. Approximately half of participants (23) reported experiencing unstable housing in the last 3 months. The majority of participants reported having had a non-fatal overdose throughout their life (36) and many reported having had an overdose in the 3 months before their baseline survey (34). During the study period, 22 participants reported experiencing at least one non-fatal overdose of any type and 18 reported experiencing at least one non-fatal overdose involving naloxone (i.e., was opioid-related).


WHAT DID THIS STUDY FIND?

Compassion club enrollment associated with reduced likelihood of non-fatal overdose of any kind

Compassion club membership reduced the likelihood of non-fatal overdose of any kind by about half (see figure below). There was also an association between sex and overdose history – women and those who identified as non-binary having a 78% lower likelihood of non-fatal overdose of any kind than men. Those who had 3 or more overdoses throughout their lives had about a 4-fold increase in the likelihood of this kind of overdose as compared to those who had fewer than 3 overdoses throughout their lives.

Compassion club enrollment associated with reduced likelihood of non-fatal overdose involving naloxone

Compassion club membership reduced the likelihood of non-fatal overdose involving naloxone by 63% (see figure below). Women and those who identified as non-binary had an 89% lower likelihood of non-fatal overdose of any kind than men; those who identified as White had a 70% lower likelihood than those of other ethnicities. Those who had 3 or more overdoses throughout their lives had about a 5-fold increase in the likelihood of this kind of overdose as compared to those who had fewer than 3 overdoses throughout their lives.


WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE STUDY FINDINGS?

Times when participants were enrolled in an unsanctioned “compassion club” that provides access to a tested safer supply of cocaine, heroin, or methamphetamine, were associated with reduced overdose risk compared to times they were not enrolled in the club. It is possible that individuals were enrolled in the club during times they were more motivated to use their drug of choice in safer ways, overall. That said, the study controlled statistically for factors that could influence the association between enrollment and overdose, such as unstable housing (e.g., with drug use in more precarious settings and situations). Given the clear conceptual link between safer supply with rigorously tested drugs and lower overdose, it is plausible, if not likely, that club enrollment was causally related to the reduced overdose rates observed in the study.

Additionally, the finding that the chance of any kind, as well as opioid-specific, overdose was lower for women and those identifying as non-binary (compared with men) could be related to their typically lower levels of impulsivity. Likewise, White ethnicity being associated with a lower likelihood of opioid-related overdoses than other ethnicities is consistent with recent trends showing a shift in the opioid crisis from a larger impact on White people to a larger impact on Black people. Finally, the finding that the likelihood of any, as well as opioid-specific, overdoses was lower for people who experienced fewer overdoses throughout their lives is not that surprising, given that people who have experienced more overdoses typically have more chronic courses of addiction and may have a more severe form of substance use disorder.

This study’s key finding – that membership in an unsanctioned, non-medicalized safer supply program was associated with a lower chance of any and opioid-related overdoses – add to the to the growing number of harm reduction strategies suggesting public health benefits. Importantly however, non-medicalized safer supply programs such as the compassion club in this study, as well as the large majority of harm reduction approaches, remain either illegal or without formal policy support to legally operate. This limits the extent to which researchers can analyze in a more rigorous scientific manner their impact on overdoses and public health. Accordingly, policy changes are needed, given the continuing overdose crisis and potential of safer supply programs to save lives and improve public health.


  1. The study was conducted in Vancouver, Canada. Results may therefore not generalize to other locations or be representative of all people who use drugs.
  2. Participants self-selected into the study. These people may have characteristics that differentiate them from other club members, which can bias the results, but it is unclear exactly how since there were no analyses examining how these groups differed from one another. For example, these people may be particularly motivated to engage in safer drug use, which may inflate the odds of overdose risk reduction.
  3. Similarly, data was collected by self-report, which is known to be subject to response biases, such as recall or social desirability. People may, for example, find it challenging to recall the exact number of overdoses they have experienced or may under-report overdose experiences during the study period because they think it is a desirable outcome for the researchers.
  4. The small sample size limits the extent to which the researchers had power to detect smaller effects. For instance, with a larger sample size, the trending association in the unadjusted model between club membership and any kind of overdose may have reached statistical significance.
  5. This was not a randomized controlled trial where some participants were assigned to the compassion club and others to a comparison group (e.g., of different or no harm reduction services) and therefore the researchers cannot conclude that club membership caused a lower chance of non-fatal overdoses. Likewise, there may have been other unmeasured influences that could have affected the results (e.g., political/social climate, season, availability of other harm reduction strategies).

BOTTOM LINE

Enrollment in a compassion club, which provides members with rigorously tested, and therefore safer drugs, was associated with reduced likelihood of experiencing a non-fatal overdose from any drug and from opioids. The likelihood of any and opioid-related overdoses was also lower for women and for those who have experienced fewer than 3 overdoses throughout their lives.


  • For individuals and families seeking recovery: This study found that membership in a compassion club that provides a safer supply of drugs to people who use drugs is associated with a lower chance of any and opioid-related overdoses. Accordingly, people who use drugs and have access to compassion clubs or other safer drug supply programs may decrease their risk of overdose, since they are reducing their reliance on an unregulated drug supply and potential exposure to contaminated drugs. However, compassion clubs and other safer supply programs remain illegal in many countries or are not yet available. People without access to such programs who similarly test their drugs through drug checking services or fentanyl test strips may also be able to reduce their overdose risk.
  • For treatment professionals and treatment systems: Compassion clubs and other safer supply programs can help people reduce their reliance on an unregulated drug supply, which can lead to fewer overdoses, as shown in this study. Treatment professionals who encourage people who use drugs to take advantage of such programs, if available to them, or otherwise test their drugs with either drug checking service or fentanyl test strips, may help their patients reduce overdose risk.
  • For scientists: Because the current study was conducted in Vancouver, future research in other locations would shed light on the extent to which the results generalize to other locations. Additionally, given the small sample size, future research with a larger sample size may increase the power to detect smaller effects. A study design that uses a randomized controlled trial would allow for examination of causality and would account for any unmeasured influences on the results, since such influences would be expected to be balanced between groups. Quasi-experimental studies (e.g., with a matched comparison group) may help balance the need for scientific rigor with ethical considerations regarding randomizing drug users to a no-service comparison condition.
  • For policy makers: This study demonstrated that membership in a compassion club that provides a safer supply of drugs to people who use drugs is associated with lower chance of any and opioid-related overdoses. The club, however, was unsanctioned. Thus, making policy changes to support the legal operation of safer supply programs, as well as promoting policies that support a safer supply of drugs in general, may save lives. Further, funding and policy support is needed for research to evaluate the impact of safer supply programs more rigorously.

CITATIONS

Kalicum, J., Nyx, E., Kennedy, M. C., & Kerr, T. (2024). The impact of an unsanctioned compassion club on non-fatal overdose. International Journal of Drug Policy, 131. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104330.


Stay on the Frontiers of
recovery science
with the free, monthly
Recovery Bulletin

l

WHAT PROBLEM DOES THIS STUDY ADDRESS?

A major contributor to the ongoing drug overdose crisis in Canada, Europe, and the US is reliance on an unregulated drug supply that may be contaminated with toxic substances, such as fentanyl. This led to a recent call by British Columbia’s chief coroner to reduce people’s dependence on the unregulated drug supply by offering people who use drugs an alternative. As a result, several safer supply programs are beginning to be implemented, although they remain controversial. These programs provide substances with known doses and compositions to people who use drugs, often through prescriptions, thereby decreasing their use of drugs from an unregulated supply. The limited research that has been done to evaluate safer supply programs has shown several benefits, such as increased access to healthcare and reduced use of unregulated opioids, though not in all cases.

Only medicalized programs that provide drugs through prescriptions have been scaled-up in Canada, since non-medicalized programs are not sanctioned. Non-medicalized programs include “compassion clubs”, where substances of known compositions are distributed to its members. Although they failed to obtain a federal exemption to operate, the Drug Users Liberation Front piloted a Compassion Club for people who use cocaine, heroin, or methamphetamine in August 2022. This club serves people who live in Vancouver’s Downtown Eastside and are at high risk of overdose. Members can purchase up to 14 grams of cocaine, heroin, and methamphetamine per week at a storefront. Substances are tested to ensure they are safe and not contaminated.

Compassion clubs such as this are a very new approach to provide a safer supply of drugs and little is known about their public health impact. Researchers in this study examined the association between club membership and impact on non-fatal overdoses. Such research can shed light on the public health impact of non-medicalized safer supply programs.


HOW WAS THIS STUDY CONDUCTED?

The research team surveyed 47 compassion club members to assess whether time periods they were enrolled in the club – determined by lottery from 5 organized groups of people who use drugs in Vancouver –were associated with reduced odds of overdose relative to time periods they were not enrolled in the club over 14 months. Participants were over the age of 19, currently using drugs, and assessed as being at risk of overdose, defined as all people using drugs in the club setting, given the local drug supply’s contamination and the overall high incidence of overdose deaths.

Surveys were conducted in a private office at the compassion club that was opened by Drug Users Liberation Front in 2022. Survey data were collected by a trained research assistant every 3 months and included 3 yes or no questions assessing whether: (1) they ever had an overdose; (2) they had an overdose during the last 3 months (or since their last survey); and (3) they had an overdose where naloxone was administered during the last 3 months (or since their last survey). They were also asked if they had shared any of the drugs they obtained from the club and if so, why. Prior to enrolling in the club, participants completed 1-2 surveys. After enrolling in the club, participants completed a maximum of 5 surveys.

The primary outcomes of interest were any non-fatal overdose, which included overdose from any drug, and any non-fatal overdose where naloxone was administered, which was more specific to opioid-related overdoses (given that naloxone is used to reverse opioid-related overdoses). The primary predictor was enrollment in the Compassion Club in the last 3 months. The research team was also interested in whether the following variables could confound the possible relationship between club membership and overdoses: age at baseline, ethnicity, sex, unstable housing in the last 3 months (treated as a variable with 2 categories, one consisting of being homeless, living in a shelter or hotel, and staying with friends or family and the other defined as living in a house/apartment), and previous number of overdoses experienced throughout participants’ lives (treated as a variable with 2 categories consisting of more than 3 overdoses or less than 3).

A total of 47 people participated in the study. Initially 21 individuals were admitted to the club and then another 28 were admitted when capacity increased, but 2 of these people withdrew from the study. Of these, the median age was 47 years old and 18 identified as women. Regarding ethnicity, 29 identified as White, 23 identified as Indigenous, and 4 identified as being of other ethnicities. Approximately half of participants (23) reported experiencing unstable housing in the last 3 months. The majority of participants reported having had a non-fatal overdose throughout their life (36) and many reported having had an overdose in the 3 months before their baseline survey (34). During the study period, 22 participants reported experiencing at least one non-fatal overdose of any type and 18 reported experiencing at least one non-fatal overdose involving naloxone (i.e., was opioid-related).


WHAT DID THIS STUDY FIND?

Compassion club enrollment associated with reduced likelihood of non-fatal overdose of any kind

Compassion club membership reduced the likelihood of non-fatal overdose of any kind by about half (see figure below). There was also an association between sex and overdose history – women and those who identified as non-binary having a 78% lower likelihood of non-fatal overdose of any kind than men. Those who had 3 or more overdoses throughout their lives had about a 4-fold increase in the likelihood of this kind of overdose as compared to those who had fewer than 3 overdoses throughout their lives.

Compassion club enrollment associated with reduced likelihood of non-fatal overdose involving naloxone

Compassion club membership reduced the likelihood of non-fatal overdose involving naloxone by 63% (see figure below). Women and those who identified as non-binary had an 89% lower likelihood of non-fatal overdose of any kind than men; those who identified as White had a 70% lower likelihood than those of other ethnicities. Those who had 3 or more overdoses throughout their lives had about a 5-fold increase in the likelihood of this kind of overdose as compared to those who had fewer than 3 overdoses throughout their lives.


WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE STUDY FINDINGS?

Times when participants were enrolled in an unsanctioned “compassion club” that provides access to a tested safer supply of cocaine, heroin, or methamphetamine, were associated with reduced overdose risk compared to times they were not enrolled in the club. It is possible that individuals were enrolled in the club during times they were more motivated to use their drug of choice in safer ways, overall. That said, the study controlled statistically for factors that could influence the association between enrollment and overdose, such as unstable housing (e.g., with drug use in more precarious settings and situations). Given the clear conceptual link between safer supply with rigorously tested drugs and lower overdose, it is plausible, if not likely, that club enrollment was causally related to the reduced overdose rates observed in the study.

Additionally, the finding that the chance of any kind, as well as opioid-specific, overdose was lower for women and those identifying as non-binary (compared with men) could be related to their typically lower levels of impulsivity. Likewise, White ethnicity being associated with a lower likelihood of opioid-related overdoses than other ethnicities is consistent with recent trends showing a shift in the opioid crisis from a larger impact on White people to a larger impact on Black people. Finally, the finding that the likelihood of any, as well as opioid-specific, overdoses was lower for people who experienced fewer overdoses throughout their lives is not that surprising, given that people who have experienced more overdoses typically have more chronic courses of addiction and may have a more severe form of substance use disorder.

This study’s key finding – that membership in an unsanctioned, non-medicalized safer supply program was associated with a lower chance of any and opioid-related overdoses – add to the to the growing number of harm reduction strategies suggesting public health benefits. Importantly however, non-medicalized safer supply programs such as the compassion club in this study, as well as the large majority of harm reduction approaches, remain either illegal or without formal policy support to legally operate. This limits the extent to which researchers can analyze in a more rigorous scientific manner their impact on overdoses and public health. Accordingly, policy changes are needed, given the continuing overdose crisis and potential of safer supply programs to save lives and improve public health.


  1. The study was conducted in Vancouver, Canada. Results may therefore not generalize to other locations or be representative of all people who use drugs.
  2. Participants self-selected into the study. These people may have characteristics that differentiate them from other club members, which can bias the results, but it is unclear exactly how since there were no analyses examining how these groups differed from one another. For example, these people may be particularly motivated to engage in safer drug use, which may inflate the odds of overdose risk reduction.
  3. Similarly, data was collected by self-report, which is known to be subject to response biases, such as recall or social desirability. People may, for example, find it challenging to recall the exact number of overdoses they have experienced or may under-report overdose experiences during the study period because they think it is a desirable outcome for the researchers.
  4. The small sample size limits the extent to which the researchers had power to detect smaller effects. For instance, with a larger sample size, the trending association in the unadjusted model between club membership and any kind of overdose may have reached statistical significance.
  5. This was not a randomized controlled trial where some participants were assigned to the compassion club and others to a comparison group (e.g., of different or no harm reduction services) and therefore the researchers cannot conclude that club membership caused a lower chance of non-fatal overdoses. Likewise, there may have been other unmeasured influences that could have affected the results (e.g., political/social climate, season, availability of other harm reduction strategies).

BOTTOM LINE

Enrollment in a compassion club, which provides members with rigorously tested, and therefore safer drugs, was associated with reduced likelihood of experiencing a non-fatal overdose from any drug and from opioids. The likelihood of any and opioid-related overdoses was also lower for women and for those who have experienced fewer than 3 overdoses throughout their lives.


  • For individuals and families seeking recovery: This study found that membership in a compassion club that provides a safer supply of drugs to people who use drugs is associated with a lower chance of any and opioid-related overdoses. Accordingly, people who use drugs and have access to compassion clubs or other safer drug supply programs may decrease their risk of overdose, since they are reducing their reliance on an unregulated drug supply and potential exposure to contaminated drugs. However, compassion clubs and other safer supply programs remain illegal in many countries or are not yet available. People without access to such programs who similarly test their drugs through drug checking services or fentanyl test strips may also be able to reduce their overdose risk.
  • For treatment professionals and treatment systems: Compassion clubs and other safer supply programs can help people reduce their reliance on an unregulated drug supply, which can lead to fewer overdoses, as shown in this study. Treatment professionals who encourage people who use drugs to take advantage of such programs, if available to them, or otherwise test their drugs with either drug checking service or fentanyl test strips, may help their patients reduce overdose risk.
  • For scientists: Because the current study was conducted in Vancouver, future research in other locations would shed light on the extent to which the results generalize to other locations. Additionally, given the small sample size, future research with a larger sample size may increase the power to detect smaller effects. A study design that uses a randomized controlled trial would allow for examination of causality and would account for any unmeasured influences on the results, since such influences would be expected to be balanced between groups. Quasi-experimental studies (e.g., with a matched comparison group) may help balance the need for scientific rigor with ethical considerations regarding randomizing drug users to a no-service comparison condition.
  • For policy makers: This study demonstrated that membership in a compassion club that provides a safer supply of drugs to people who use drugs is associated with lower chance of any and opioid-related overdoses. The club, however, was unsanctioned. Thus, making policy changes to support the legal operation of safer supply programs, as well as promoting policies that support a safer supply of drugs in general, may save lives. Further, funding and policy support is needed for research to evaluate the impact of safer supply programs more rigorously.

CITATIONS

Kalicum, J., Nyx, E., Kennedy, M. C., & Kerr, T. (2024). The impact of an unsanctioned compassion club on non-fatal overdose. International Journal of Drug Policy, 131. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104330.


Share this article

l

WHAT PROBLEM DOES THIS STUDY ADDRESS?

A major contributor to the ongoing drug overdose crisis in Canada, Europe, and the US is reliance on an unregulated drug supply that may be contaminated with toxic substances, such as fentanyl. This led to a recent call by British Columbia’s chief coroner to reduce people’s dependence on the unregulated drug supply by offering people who use drugs an alternative. As a result, several safer supply programs are beginning to be implemented, although they remain controversial. These programs provide substances with known doses and compositions to people who use drugs, often through prescriptions, thereby decreasing their use of drugs from an unregulated supply. The limited research that has been done to evaluate safer supply programs has shown several benefits, such as increased access to healthcare and reduced use of unregulated opioids, though not in all cases.

Only medicalized programs that provide drugs through prescriptions have been scaled-up in Canada, since non-medicalized programs are not sanctioned. Non-medicalized programs include “compassion clubs”, where substances of known compositions are distributed to its members. Although they failed to obtain a federal exemption to operate, the Drug Users Liberation Front piloted a Compassion Club for people who use cocaine, heroin, or methamphetamine in August 2022. This club serves people who live in Vancouver’s Downtown Eastside and are at high risk of overdose. Members can purchase up to 14 grams of cocaine, heroin, and methamphetamine per week at a storefront. Substances are tested to ensure they are safe and not contaminated.

Compassion clubs such as this are a very new approach to provide a safer supply of drugs and little is known about their public health impact. Researchers in this study examined the association between club membership and impact on non-fatal overdoses. Such research can shed light on the public health impact of non-medicalized safer supply programs.


HOW WAS THIS STUDY CONDUCTED?

The research team surveyed 47 compassion club members to assess whether time periods they were enrolled in the club – determined by lottery from 5 organized groups of people who use drugs in Vancouver –were associated with reduced odds of overdose relative to time periods they were not enrolled in the club over 14 months. Participants were over the age of 19, currently using drugs, and assessed as being at risk of overdose, defined as all people using drugs in the club setting, given the local drug supply’s contamination and the overall high incidence of overdose deaths.

Surveys were conducted in a private office at the compassion club that was opened by Drug Users Liberation Front in 2022. Survey data were collected by a trained research assistant every 3 months and included 3 yes or no questions assessing whether: (1) they ever had an overdose; (2) they had an overdose during the last 3 months (or since their last survey); and (3) they had an overdose where naloxone was administered during the last 3 months (or since their last survey). They were also asked if they had shared any of the drugs they obtained from the club and if so, why. Prior to enrolling in the club, participants completed 1-2 surveys. After enrolling in the club, participants completed a maximum of 5 surveys.

The primary outcomes of interest were any non-fatal overdose, which included overdose from any drug, and any non-fatal overdose where naloxone was administered, which was more specific to opioid-related overdoses (given that naloxone is used to reverse opioid-related overdoses). The primary predictor was enrollment in the Compassion Club in the last 3 months. The research team was also interested in whether the following variables could confound the possible relationship between club membership and overdoses: age at baseline, ethnicity, sex, unstable housing in the last 3 months (treated as a variable with 2 categories, one consisting of being homeless, living in a shelter or hotel, and staying with friends or family and the other defined as living in a house/apartment), and previous number of overdoses experienced throughout participants’ lives (treated as a variable with 2 categories consisting of more than 3 overdoses or less than 3).

A total of 47 people participated in the study. Initially 21 individuals were admitted to the club and then another 28 were admitted when capacity increased, but 2 of these people withdrew from the study. Of these, the median age was 47 years old and 18 identified as women. Regarding ethnicity, 29 identified as White, 23 identified as Indigenous, and 4 identified as being of other ethnicities. Approximately half of participants (23) reported experiencing unstable housing in the last 3 months. The majority of participants reported having had a non-fatal overdose throughout their life (36) and many reported having had an overdose in the 3 months before their baseline survey (34). During the study period, 22 participants reported experiencing at least one non-fatal overdose of any type and 18 reported experiencing at least one non-fatal overdose involving naloxone (i.e., was opioid-related).


WHAT DID THIS STUDY FIND?

Compassion club enrollment associated with reduced likelihood of non-fatal overdose of any kind

Compassion club membership reduced the likelihood of non-fatal overdose of any kind by about half (see figure below). There was also an association between sex and overdose history – women and those who identified as non-binary having a 78% lower likelihood of non-fatal overdose of any kind than men. Those who had 3 or more overdoses throughout their lives had about a 4-fold increase in the likelihood of this kind of overdose as compared to those who had fewer than 3 overdoses throughout their lives.

Compassion club enrollment associated with reduced likelihood of non-fatal overdose involving naloxone

Compassion club membership reduced the likelihood of non-fatal overdose involving naloxone by 63% (see figure below). Women and those who identified as non-binary had an 89% lower likelihood of non-fatal overdose of any kind than men; those who identified as White had a 70% lower likelihood than those of other ethnicities. Those who had 3 or more overdoses throughout their lives had about a 5-fold increase in the likelihood of this kind of overdose as compared to those who had fewer than 3 overdoses throughout their lives.


WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE STUDY FINDINGS?

Times when participants were enrolled in an unsanctioned “compassion club” that provides access to a tested safer supply of cocaine, heroin, or methamphetamine, were associated with reduced overdose risk compared to times they were not enrolled in the club. It is possible that individuals were enrolled in the club during times they were more motivated to use their drug of choice in safer ways, overall. That said, the study controlled statistically for factors that could influence the association between enrollment and overdose, such as unstable housing (e.g., with drug use in more precarious settings and situations). Given the clear conceptual link between safer supply with rigorously tested drugs and lower overdose, it is plausible, if not likely, that club enrollment was causally related to the reduced overdose rates observed in the study.

Additionally, the finding that the chance of any kind, as well as opioid-specific, overdose was lower for women and those identifying as non-binary (compared with men) could be related to their typically lower levels of impulsivity. Likewise, White ethnicity being associated with a lower likelihood of opioid-related overdoses than other ethnicities is consistent with recent trends showing a shift in the opioid crisis from a larger impact on White people to a larger impact on Black people. Finally, the finding that the likelihood of any, as well as opioid-specific, overdoses was lower for people who experienced fewer overdoses throughout their lives is not that surprising, given that people who have experienced more overdoses typically have more chronic courses of addiction and may have a more severe form of substance use disorder.

This study’s key finding – that membership in an unsanctioned, non-medicalized safer supply program was associated with a lower chance of any and opioid-related overdoses – add to the to the growing number of harm reduction strategies suggesting public health benefits. Importantly however, non-medicalized safer supply programs such as the compassion club in this study, as well as the large majority of harm reduction approaches, remain either illegal or without formal policy support to legally operate. This limits the extent to which researchers can analyze in a more rigorous scientific manner their impact on overdoses and public health. Accordingly, policy changes are needed, given the continuing overdose crisis and potential of safer supply programs to save lives and improve public health.


  1. The study was conducted in Vancouver, Canada. Results may therefore not generalize to other locations or be representative of all people who use drugs.
  2. Participants self-selected into the study. These people may have characteristics that differentiate them from other club members, which can bias the results, but it is unclear exactly how since there were no analyses examining how these groups differed from one another. For example, these people may be particularly motivated to engage in safer drug use, which may inflate the odds of overdose risk reduction.
  3. Similarly, data was collected by self-report, which is known to be subject to response biases, such as recall or social desirability. People may, for example, find it challenging to recall the exact number of overdoses they have experienced or may under-report overdose experiences during the study period because they think it is a desirable outcome for the researchers.
  4. The small sample size limits the extent to which the researchers had power to detect smaller effects. For instance, with a larger sample size, the trending association in the unadjusted model between club membership and any kind of overdose may have reached statistical significance.
  5. This was not a randomized controlled trial where some participants were assigned to the compassion club and others to a comparison group (e.g., of different or no harm reduction services) and therefore the researchers cannot conclude that club membership caused a lower chance of non-fatal overdoses. Likewise, there may have been other unmeasured influences that could have affected the results (e.g., political/social climate, season, availability of other harm reduction strategies).

BOTTOM LINE

Enrollment in a compassion club, which provides members with rigorously tested, and therefore safer drugs, was associated with reduced likelihood of experiencing a non-fatal overdose from any drug and from opioids. The likelihood of any and opioid-related overdoses was also lower for women and for those who have experienced fewer than 3 overdoses throughout their lives.


  • For individuals and families seeking recovery: This study found that membership in a compassion club that provides a safer supply of drugs to people who use drugs is associated with a lower chance of any and opioid-related overdoses. Accordingly, people who use drugs and have access to compassion clubs or other safer drug supply programs may decrease their risk of overdose, since they are reducing their reliance on an unregulated drug supply and potential exposure to contaminated drugs. However, compassion clubs and other safer supply programs remain illegal in many countries or are not yet available. People without access to such programs who similarly test their drugs through drug checking services or fentanyl test strips may also be able to reduce their overdose risk.
  • For treatment professionals and treatment systems: Compassion clubs and other safer supply programs can help people reduce their reliance on an unregulated drug supply, which can lead to fewer overdoses, as shown in this study. Treatment professionals who encourage people who use drugs to take advantage of such programs, if available to them, or otherwise test their drugs with either drug checking service or fentanyl test strips, may help their patients reduce overdose risk.
  • For scientists: Because the current study was conducted in Vancouver, future research in other locations would shed light on the extent to which the results generalize to other locations. Additionally, given the small sample size, future research with a larger sample size may increase the power to detect smaller effects. A study design that uses a randomized controlled trial would allow for examination of causality and would account for any unmeasured influences on the results, since such influences would be expected to be balanced between groups. Quasi-experimental studies (e.g., with a matched comparison group) may help balance the need for scientific rigor with ethical considerations regarding randomizing drug users to a no-service comparison condition.
  • For policy makers: This study demonstrated that membership in a compassion club that provides a safer supply of drugs to people who use drugs is associated with lower chance of any and opioid-related overdoses. The club, however, was unsanctioned. Thus, making policy changes to support the legal operation of safer supply programs, as well as promoting policies that support a safer supply of drugs in general, may save lives. Further, funding and policy support is needed for research to evaluate the impact of safer supply programs more rigorously.

CITATIONS

Kalicum, J., Nyx, E., Kennedy, M. C., & Kerr, T. (2024). The impact of an unsanctioned compassion club on non-fatal overdose. International Journal of Drug Policy, 131. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104330.


Share this article